Frequently Asked Questions

Three deliverables, every time:

• Marked-up documents — your PDFs annotated comment by comment, so your team can act on each point directly.
• Compliance matrix — every requirement of the applicable standards and your project specification, mapped against your documentation, with a status for each.
• Pass/Fail recommendation — a clear statement of whether your pack is ready to submit, and a prioritised list of what to fix if it isn't.

Fixed fees, agreed before we start: custom inspection checklists from €1,500, ITP and test pack reviews from €2,500, handover pack reviews from €3,000. The exact fixed fee depends on package size and complexity — you get it in writing before we begin, and it never changes mid-engagement unless you change the scope in writing. All fees exclude VAT.

For context: a rejected handover pack typically costs weeks of rework and delay penalties that dwarf the review fee.

Checklists in 1–2 weeks, ITP/test pack reviews in 2–3 weeks, full handover packs in 3–4 weeks — confirmed in the engagement letter before we start. If your deadline is tighter, tell us; we will say honestly whether we can meet it rather than over-promise.

SFS 6000 (Finnish electrical installations, including Part 6 testing), EN 50600 (data centre facilities), ISO 9001:2015 (quality management and document control), Good Documentation Practice (ALCOA+ principles) — plus your project's own specification and the main contractor's QA requirements. Every finding cites the specific clause it traces to.

A mutual NDA is available before you share anything, and confidentiality is built into our General Terms of Business. Your documents are used solely for delivering the review, are never shared with third parties, and are deleted 90 days after the engagement closes unless you ask otherwise. See our Privacy Policy for the details.

Structure, not promises. We hold no design, construction, or project-management scope on any project we review, and every enquiry is screened against a conflict-of-interest register before we accept it. If reviewing your pack would create a conflict, we decline the work. The full commitment is in our Independence Charter.

Yes, openly. Our methodology includes AI-assisted analysis for coverage and consistency — it is part of how we deliver thorough reviews at fixed fees. Every finding is reviewed and approved by a qualified professional before release, and we retain full professional responsibility for every deliverable regardless of the tools used to prepare it.

Three things:

• The documents to review (PDF, Word, or Excel — native files preferred over scans).
• The project specification or employer's requirements the documents must satisfy.
• A named contact for queries during the review.

If you don't have the specification, we can review against the applicable standards alone — we'll flag that limitation clearly in the report.

Probably. Our depth is Nordic data centre projects, but the review method — standards-traced findings, compliance matrices, Pass/Fail gates — applies to documentation on any construction or regulated project. Get in touch and we'll tell you honestly whether we're the right fit.

Your team fixes the gaps and submits. If you want us to re-check the corrected documents before submission, a delta review of the revised pack is quoted separately — usually a fraction of the original fee, since we only re-examine what changed.